• ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Looking at the discussion, these are folks we don’t want here anyway ya know. They’re kind of adverse to high quality commentary and primarily prefer bitching to effort.

  • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Will this keep Redditors saying other alternatives like Lemmy are not worth it?

    Lemmy sucks regardless what Reddit does. // Its not mutually exclusive, they both suck.

    Every fucking thing sucks. If you want the perfect place, tough luck - you won’t get it, ever.

    So instead you look for the place that sucks the least, given your priorities. And when one place is becoming shittier by the day (like Reddit), the others (like Lemmy) do become more attractive.

      • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        The perfect place wouldn’t allow them [people bringing their own shit?] anyway.

        As in, isolating the system? No perfect isolation is possible; and even if it was, it would limit the amount of information/entropy of the place. In other words the community would get stale and die.

        We could pretend moderators are like Maxwell’s demon, able to sift the newbies one by one; if they’re bringing shit, don’t let them in. The amount of energy necessary to do so makes it unfeasible.

        • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          22 hours ago

          No, im saying “no club that would have them could possibly meet their standards”. That they are themselves a flaw they would not tolerate.

          mods are like maxwells demon

          I’m stealing this for my own personal concept of the world and ignoring the rest of what you said in favor of a more fun idea.

          If we wish to achieve cosmism, we must make more forums with more moderators, and also ideally making them as small as we can. It’s the only way. We can fix everything.

          • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Got it - sorry for the confusion then!

            And I need to admit that your take of the mod = Maxwell’s demon thing is way more interesting.

            • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              21 hours ago

              your idea

              Hey, credit where it’s due. This is yours, im just running with it. The rest of what you’re saying isn’t about pseudo mystical hard scifi space communism though. Boring.

      • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yup, pretty much.

        And there’s more: if, hypothetically speaking, we could make a platform completely shit-free, people migrating to that platform would bring their own shit with them, so the platform would be shitty again. As if there was some sort of equilibrium to be restored.

        …I’m going to call this Le Shitalier’s principle.

      • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Perhaps the relative amount of all-or-nothing folks is different, but you’re right - they’re here too. And everywhere in the internet.

        In fact, I have a hypothesis that four donkeymen are to blame for most social media woes:

        1. Decontextualisation - when some info or reasoning is present in the context, disregard it.
        2. Assumption - when some info or reasoning is absent from the text, make the opposite up.
        3. Oversimplification - when it’s too much info or reasoning, disregard even critical bits.
        4. Genetic fallacy - when the info or reasoning comes from a specific source, automatically label it true or false.

        The all-or-nothing folks sit squarely at #3; for them gradients - like “Lemmy has some shit, Reddit has more shit, thus Lemmy is less worse than Reddit” - are hateful, too much info, too “hard”, too “I don’t understand, I’m so confused…”. It’s simpler to say “Lemmy has shit, Reddit has shit, both equal, EDIT WOW THANKS FOR THE GOLD KIND STRANGER!!1ONE”.