That’s what I’m saying. Until you or someone provide a source with more details, we won’t know if the photo is real, or if it was up longer than 5 minutes. The assumption that anyone parked there after the “decoration” was already up is a heavy assumption.
It isn’t unrealistic that this wasn’t put up during the protests in the last few days. Also, why wouldn’t you charge there? The cars aren’t getting destroyed just because the signs are there.
I’m not saying anything happened or didn’t, I’m just replying to someone wondering why would someone charge at such a defaced charger, that there are many explanations for why they didn’t. Simplest being that they were already charging when it was defaced.
Source?
That’s what I’m saying. Until you or someone provide a source with more details, we won’t know if the photo is real, or if it was up longer than 5 minutes. The assumption that anyone parked there after the “decoration” was already up is a heavy assumption.
It isn’t unrealistic that this wasn’t put up during the protests in the last few days. Also, why wouldn’t you charge there? The cars aren’t getting destroyed just because the signs are there.
I’m not saying anything happened or didn’t, I’m just replying to someone wondering why would someone charge at such a defaced charger, that there are many explanations for why they didn’t. Simplest being that they were already charging when it was defaced.
Ok. But that’s just your assumption.
Yes, so is the comment I was replying to, that was my point.